<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magic moments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mukimuki.fr/flashblog/2009/05/20/magic-moments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mukimuki.fr/flashblog/2009/05/20/magic-moments/</link>
	<description>The Actionscript Wrestler !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:48:40 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Niels Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.mukimuki.fr/flashblog/2009/05/20/magic-moments/comment-page-1/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mukimuki.fr/flashblog/?p=155#comment-847</guid>
		<description>Hey Benjamin..

is there a way to tell, if the lookup shape is at all in the image with this method? I found that with real life pictures this method is always finding something in the image that seems to be likely to the lookup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Benjamin..</p>
<p>is there a way to tell, if the lookup shape is at all in the image with this method? I found that with real life pictures this method is always finding something in the image that seems to be likely to the lookup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.mukimuki.fr/flashblog/2009/05/20/magic-moments/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mukimuki.fr/flashblog/?p=155#comment-49</guid>
		<description>@Og2t:
I did not do some benchmark between bytesarray and 2-D loops. If I remember what I have read it is better to use bytesarray for large bitmapdata, but otherwise the speed is not so different. But I have to check what I am saying, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.joa-ebert.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joa&lt;/a&gt; wrote a nice &lt;a href=&quot;http://http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2008/04/26/actionscript-3-optimization-techniques/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;paper&lt;/a&gt; about this topic ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Og2t:<br />
I did not do some benchmark between bytesarray and 2-D loops. If I remember what I have read it is better to use bytesarray for large bitmapdata, but otherwise the speed is not so different. But I have to check what I am saying, <a href="http://blog.joa-ebert.com/" rel="nofollow">Joa</a> wrote a nice <a href="http://http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2008/04/26/actionscript-3-optimization-techniques/" rel="nofollow">paper</a> about this topic <img src='http://www.mukimuki.fr/flashblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Og2t</title>
		<link>http://www.mukimuki.fr/flashblog/2009/05/20/magic-moments/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Og2t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mukimuki.fr/flashblog/?p=155#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Great blog and very interesting stuff here, I am gonna try that technique with blob detection. How about BitmapData.getPixels method to get all the pixels into the ByteArray (for speed)? Cheers, Tomek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog and very interesting stuff here, I am gonna try that technique with blob detection. How about BitmapData.getPixels method to get all the pixels into the ByteArray (for speed)? Cheers, Tomek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muki Muki » Camshift: Source and explanation</title>
		<link>http://www.mukimuki.fr/flashblog/2009/05/20/magic-moments/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Muki Muki » Camshift: Source and explanation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mukimuki.fr/flashblog/?p=155#comment-45</guid>
		<description>[...] locating the maximum of density of the probabilities distribution, Camshift uses the 2nd order moment to retrieve the size and the orientation of the  distribution. Actually camshift is almost the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] locating the maximum of density of the probabilities distribution, Camshift uses the 2nd order moment to retrieve the size and the orientation of the  distribution. Actually camshift is almost the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

